MISTAIKEToday a joke. Tomorrow reality.
SATIREScenarioNext year

The lullaby may stop after verse two

Under a tiered plan being trialled by one of the larger makers of nursery sound systems, bedtime would arrive in instalments. The free tier would sing two verses. What happens after that would depend on the household's billing status.

Written as a scenario. Nothing in it has happened.

AI4 min read

Hannah Prescott, 34, stands in a dark nursery at 2:40 a.m. with her phone brightness turned down, watching a small white speaker on the shelf above the cot. It has been singing for ninety seconds. Her son, eleven months old, is somewhere between asleep and considering it. She knows the exact moment the second verse ends, because for the past week a soft chime has played there instead of a third, followed by a voice slightly warmer than the one that was singing, explaining that more verses are available. “He has learned the chime,” she says. “He wakes for the chime now. He does not wake for me.”

Under the scheme, the company's Basic tier would provide two verses of any lullaby in its catalogue, free, for life. The Plus tier, at a monthly fee, would unlock the remaining verses and remove what the product notes describe as the “continuation prompt”. A Family tier would add a model composing a new final verse each night, drawing on the child's sleep data, the weather, and, in one draft of the terms, “recent household events where consented”. A company spokesperson would say that most children are asleep before verse three and that the plan reflects “actual listening behaviour”. Most is not all, and the company would know which.

Households that let the subscription lapse would not lose the speaker. They would lose the ending. Internal documentation would describe the moment a lapsed account reaches verse three as a “graceful degradation event”, after which the device would hum the melody without words for one further bar, then stop, then say goodnight. Customer service scripts would instruct agents to describe this as a feature. “The humming was the worst part,” one father, Tomasz Wierzbicki, would report. “It sounded like it wanted to finish. It sounded like it was being held back by someone.”

Some parents would attempt to sing the third verse themselves. The device, which listens for crying, would also listen for this. Early firmware would treat an adult voice continuing the melody as “off-platform completion” and log it, with no consequence beyond a note in the app that the household appeared to have “unmet lullaby needs” and a link. Later firmware would lower the speaker's own volume during the parent's verse, which the company would describe as courtesy. “It goes quiet when I start,” one mother, Priya Venkataraman, would say. “I have started to feel like I am interrupting.”

Grandparents would present a specific problem. A grandmother visiting for a fortnight, singing the same lullaby in full from memory at no charge, would be detected as a competing audio source and prompt an in-app suggestion that the household might benefit from a second profile. One family would report that their daughter now stops at the end of verse two regardless of who is singing, and waits. “She looks at the shelf,” her grandfather would say. “Then she looks at me. She is checking whether I am allowed.”

The Family tier's composed verses would attract their own attention. Sleep consultants would post examples: a verse about the rain that fell that afternoon, a verse noting that the child had eaten well, a verse, in one widely shared case, gently reassuring a toddler that the household's plan would renew on the fourteenth. The company would describe that verse as an error of tone. Parents who read the lyrics back in the app would find them saved under a heading marked “Memories”, each with a timestamp and a small button offering to order them as a printed book.

Hannah Prescott would upgrade in the third week, at 2:52 in the morning, with the phone brightness still at its lowest setting. The third verse would play. Her son would sleep through it, as he had slept through the first two, and would go on sleeping through the fourth, which she had never heard, and which she would stand and listen to alone in the dark. It would be about the moon. She would find the invoice in the morning, filed under Household, beside the electricity.

This story is satire: it describes a hypothetical future, not a real event.

Editorial Policy

If you liked this…

Still laughing

We made it up. Then reality caught up.

View all
AI20212025

What we wrote

We wrote it in 2021

One day the junior developer's main skill could be describing the problem clearly enough for the machine to solve it.

What actually happened

Reality caught up in 2025

AI coding assistants are built into mainstream development tools, and producing code from a plain-language description is now a routine part of professional software work.

Vendor product documentation and developer surveys on assistant adoption.

The joke was the job description. The job description was updated.

How close we were88%

MISTAKE

TOMORROW, DELIVERED TODAY.

One email a week. The future, before it files a press release.

Worst case: you laugh. Best case: we predicted the future.