Being served by a person may become a paid upgrade
A pricing model circulating in the service industries would turn human assistance into a chargeable tier. The fee would be small. Its exact size would tell you, for the first time, what a company thinks your patience is worth.
A pricing framework under discussion among customer-operations consultants would formalise something several sectors have been approaching sideways for a decade: human contact as a priced service level. Under the model, a bank, an airline or a retailer would continue to offer automated service free of charge, and would add a small fee for the option of dealing with a person. The fee would be disclosed at the point of choice, which the draft regards as the ethical part.
The word surcharge would not survive the first review. The model proposes assisted service, sold the way legroom is sold: not as a deprivation reversed, but as a comfort added. The distinction matters commercially and nowhere else. The draft is careful to note that the free tier would remain fully functional, in the sense that it would eventually end the call.
The pricing logic is the interesting part. A human conversation costs a firm a known and unremarkable amount. An automated one costs a fraction of it. The fee would therefore not be set at cost. It would be set at the level where enough customers decline — which makes the published number a direct measurement of how much irritation the average customer will absorb before paying to make it stop. No company has ever had to print that figure before.
“Nobody would be denied a human,” a spokesperson for the model's authors would say. “Access would simply be priced, as access to most things is priced. We would regard that as more honest than the present arrangement, in which access to a human is free and unobtainable.”
The exemption list would become the most-read page of any such policy. Bereavement, disability, suspected fraud and formal complaints would all be exempt, for obvious reasons — which means the list would consist almost exactly of the conversations a company would least like to have. Consumer regulators would notice this quickly. Drafting the exemptions would take longer than building the system.
The strangest feature would be the accounting. The fee would arrive in the annual report as revenue, on a different page from the labour cost it pays for. A customer buying ten minutes of a person's attention would be, in the most literal sense available, paying for that person's job — a transaction that has always existed and has never before been itemised.
The price will be small. That is the design. Small enough that paying it feels reasonable, and large enough to sort a customer base into those who get a conversation and those who get a transcript. Everything after that sorting is service design, which is how most arrangements of this kind arrive: not as a decision anyone announces, but as a default that turns out to have a price list.
If you liked this…
Your resignation may need approval from your replacement
A proposed offboarding workflow would route the leaver's final knowledge transfer through the system inheriting the work. The system would be permitted to ask follow-up questions. It would have many.
Your voice may be scored for tone — never for feeling
Emotion recognition at work is prohibited in Europe. A compliance approach now circulating among vendors would keep the product intact and change the noun.
Your living room may become a taxable branch office
A tax authority note would treat the home of a long-term cross-border remote worker as a permanent establishment of their employer. Companies would answer with a daily allowance of foreign days and a laptop that checks where it is.
Still laughing
We made it up. Then reality caught up.
What we wrote
We wrote it in 2021
One day the junior developer's main skill could be describing the problem clearly enough for the machine to solve it.
What actually happened
Reality caught up in 2025
AI coding assistants are built into mainstream development tools, and producing code from a plain-language description is now a routine part of professional software work.
Vendor product documentation and developer surveys on assistant adoption.
The joke was the job description. The job description was updated.
MISTAKE
TOMORROW, DELIVERED TODAY.
One email a week. The future, before it files a press release.
Worst case: you laugh. Best case: we predicted the future.
