MISTAIKEToday a joke. Tomorrow reality.
SATIREScenarioBy 2030

Your grave may be unavailable on Tuesdays

Four hours. That is how long, on the first Tuesday of every month, the Bryant family's grandmother would be unavailable under a scheduled maintenance window proposed by one of the larger cemetery-management platforms, and keeping her reachable through it would cost the household an extra four euros a month. The plot itself would not move.

Written as a scenario. Nothing in it has happened.

Tech4 min read

Under the scheme, the platform, which would already run the plot register, the pedestrian gates, the electric grave candles and the QR memorial pages for several hundred municipal cemeteries, would consolidate its software updates into a single window between 02:00 and 06:00. During those hours the memorial pages would return a holding message, the candles would be set to a state described in the documentation as pending, and the gates would accept staff cards only. Visitors arriving on foot would be able to see the graves through the railings. The documentation would classify the deceased as non-critical workloads.

The platform's case for the window would rest on what it calls the live-patching era. Previously, updates would have been pushed to cemeteries as they became ready, with results the company's own incident log would describe as uneven: one firmware release would have reassigned two hundred plots to a neighbouring parish for eleven minutes, and a font change would have rendered every headstone inscription in the grave-finder app as a date of birth. “Every serious system has a maintenance window,” the platform's head of reliability would tell a trade conference. “We are simply extending that discipline to a workload that has, historically, been left to run unattended.”

Pricing would follow the pattern familiar from cloud storage. The basic plan would include the monthly window and a text message the evening before. A high-availability plot, at four euros a month, would mirror the memorial page and the candle state to a second data centre in another region, so that mourning could continue with what the brochure calls no perceptible interruption. Family vaults would be eligible for an enterprise tier with a dedicated status page and a named account manager. The top tier would be marketed under the phrase geo-redundant remembrance, and would be the only one to offer a refund.

Deborah Ashworth, 61, would visit her husband every Tuesday before her early shift at a distribution centre, which would place her at the gate at 05:40, twenty minutes inside the window. Under the scheme she would find the turnstile locked and the memorial page showing a spinning icon above the words retry later. The platform would offer her, by way of compensation, a maintenance voucher redeemable against one candle credit. “He was a plumber,” she would say. “He'd have understood the window. He'd have wanted to know why it takes four hours. He would not have understood the voucher.”

Not every visitor would object. Colin Peverell, 44, would begin timing his visits to his mother to fall inside the window, on the grounds that the audio guide would be off, the candles would not blink, and nobody would be scanning anything. “It's the only time it feels like a cemetery,” he would say, standing outside the railings. Groundskeepers, meanwhile, would be placed on an on-call rota for the duration, with a pager and a fifteen-minute target for escalating what the runbook calls a stuck grave. One of them, asked what his job used to involve, would say leaves.

When a window overran, the platform would publish a post-incident report in the format used across the industry. A sample provided to councils would read, in full: between 02:14 and 03:50 a subset of the deceased experienced degraded availability; root cause, an expired certificate; remediation, monitoring has been added. Families would be able to subscribe to these reports by text message, and would receive them at roughly the hour the incident occurred. The word deceased would appear in each report exactly once, in the section headed Impact. The section headed Lessons Learned would be the longest, and would not mention anyone.

The window would also be the moment at which grave leases renewed. Plots would be held on twenty-five-year terms, and under the scheme renewal would move to a stored card, charged at 02:00 on the first Tuesday of the relevant year. A declined payment would place the plot in read-only mode for ninety days, during which visits would be permitted but candles would not light, before a process the documentation calls deprovisioning. The Bryant family would choose the basic plan. Their grandmother would be available 99.4 per cent of the time, which her granddaughter would note is more than she managed at Christmas.

This story is satire: it describes a hypothetical future, not a real event.

Editorial Policy

If you liked this…

Still laughing

We made it up. Then reality caught up.

View all
AI20212025

What we wrote

We wrote it in 2021

One day the junior developer's main skill could be describing the problem clearly enough for the machine to solve it.

What actually happened

Reality caught up in 2025

AI coding assistants are built into mainstream development tools, and producing code from a plain-language description is now a routine part of professional software work.

Vendor product documentation and developer surveys on assistant adoption.

The joke was the job description. The job description was updated.

How close we were88%

MISTAKE

TOMORROW, DELIVERED TODAY.

One email a week. The future, before it files a press release.

Worst case: you laugh. Best case: we predicted the future.